The only ones violating the law were the deputies and state. The supreme law of the land is the Constitution and nowhere did I read in Amendment two that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed except for being on public school property. I have never read anything that follows "shall not be infringed." Exceptions are not listed in the 2nd Amendment when it comes to possessing and bearing arms, so any law made that restricts those two things are null and void. So the federal government and states are violating the law, not this guy. Put me on the jury and it will be "not guilty."
“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs.Madison, 1803.)
“Every law consistent with the Constitution will have been made in pursuance of the powers granted by it. Every usurpation or law repugnant to it cannot have been made in pursuance of its powers. The latter will be nugatory and void.” (Thomas Jefferson.)
“There is no position which depends on clearer principles than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.” (Alexander Hamilton.)