Alexcabbie
Regular Member
imported post
spiritof76 wrote:
BUT if even ten percent of what was contained in that site is true, then it is time fr an armed revolt. WHICH IT IS NOT!!! Yet.
You have gravely insulted me in calling me a "disinformation artist". I am nothing of the kind. What I am, Sir, is SANE.
spiritof76 wrote:
There is nothing rational about the aforementioned website. It reads like Lyndon LaRouche on pscylocybin mushrooms. I am most assuredly no truster of the Federal government (especially THIS Administration and Congress) but 99 percent of the things pointed to (with great alarm) therein would require at some point a vote in the Senate, and (like the Sotomayor nomination) be met with a storm of public outcry that would result in the treaty enabling these paranoid fantasies to be rejected quite soundly. I have no doubt, sir, that our democratic processes that ensure the functioning of our representative republic are presently under siege by would-be tyrants who would pervert them for their evil ends. And have been for some time. But - for now - the system given us by the Founders is working. It is just a constant battle to keep it that way. Yes there is danger, there always has been and there always will be. This is why we must remain vigilant and keep our powder dry.Alexcabbie wrote:No, but employing name-calling and ridicule to avoid rational discussion of issues is a prime indicator of a disinformation artist.Did you go to that paranoid trilateral-commission - words fail me, nutbar site he posted? Geeze, every paranoid black helicopter theory there is and then some.
Belief that most people dont know how much we are controlled by dark conspiracies is according to the test a prime indicator of susceptibility to fascist propaganda.
BUT if even ten percent of what was contained in that site is true, then it is time fr an armed revolt. WHICH IT IS NOT!!! Yet.
You have gravely insulted me in calling me a "disinformation artist". I am nothing of the kind. What I am, Sir, is SANE.