mock all you want but it has to come. Between the financial crisis that will almost certainly cause a meltdown such has not been seen since 1929 and the virtual neutering of our southern border and the risk of terrorism I find it next to impossible to believe we will escape. Those that can't farm will be totally reliant on those that can and do. If one lives near an Amish community one would be wise to take lessons from them. Not to mention the need to defend against looters and rioters and for that you'll need several guns and plenty of ammo.
Rightwinger and all,
Primus is just a meaningless government shill. Pay no attention to his mockery and ridicule.
The truth is that the shadow government actually wants a nuclear strike on America to happen. I fully realize that this is a very big statement but there have been many dozens of major actions that have been taken by the government that prove they are deliberately weakening our national security.
I could give a lengthy list of these undertakings, but I’ll limit myself to just three.
First is that the government completely shut down the Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) on March 15th, 2013 !!!
Second is another stunning act of treason when the government gave away seven strategic, oil-rich islands in Alaska to the Russians. The State Department did the giveaway under the guise of a maritime boundary agreement between Alaska and Siberia. The agreement was negotiated in total secrecy. The State of Alaska was not allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given any opportunity for comment.
Third is the shutting down of the U.S. Air Force’s “Space Fence” surveillance system.
Our southern border is, in part, protected by TARS, which utilizes moored balloons hovering at about 15,000 feet to identify low flying aircraft and missiles that may penetrate the border and cross into U.S. airspace.
The system is used by the Air Force, the North American Aerospace Defense Command, and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for a number of missions including detection of drug smuggling and preservation of the air sovereignty of the continental U.S. In addition to the southern border, other TARS sites include the White Sands Missile Range, Puerto Rico, and numerous other towns in Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, Virginia, and Florida.
According to Exelis Systems Corporation, the company that built and jointly maintains TARS with the U.S. Air Force, the government has ordered a complete shutdown. All aerostat flight operations will cease on March 15th, 2013, and the remainder of the year will be used to deflate aerostats, disposition equipment, and prepare all sites for permanent closure.
The significance of this major announcement is that without these defense radars, all low flying aircraft infiltrating our borders will go undetected. It will be open season for any terrorists flying in with nukes, low altitude nuclear missiles, or even a full scale low elevation invasion/attack against America.
With China actively and openly deploying Russian-made low altitude strategic bombers and designing EMP weapons capable of disabling the country’s power grid, it’s difficult to imagine any motivation behind the move other than a deliberate act to significantly weaken U.S. air defenses on the southern border.
Another stunning act of treason is the shutting down of the U.S. Air Force’s space surveillance system that tracks satellites and other orbiting objects which took place on October 1st, 2013 due to budget constraints caused by automatic federal budget cuts known as the sequestration. The surveillance system got the nickname “Space Fence” because it transmits a “fence” of radar energy vertically into space that can detect any object (such as a space based EMP weapon) or debris that crosses it without being cued to do so. Commander of the Air Force Space Command, General William Shelton, said the system - which has been in operation since 1961 - was outmoded and that newer technology will provide more accurate observations. Shelton said a new Space Fence is being planned now, which will provide more precise positional data on orbiting objects and would become the most accurate radar in the Air Force’s space surveillance network. In other words, they are shutting down one of nation’s most important defense systems BEFORE they have another in place to replace it !!! Why not shut down one of the many hundreds of military bases around the world instead of the Space Fence? It makes no intelligent sense, other than a deliberate weakening of America’s military defense.
The final act of treason that I’ll discuss is that the government gave away seven strategic, oil-rich Alaskan islands to the Russians. At a minimum, the oil alone from these islands should be considered to be a military asset. More importantly, these seven islands in the Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea could be used as a military staging area from which to invade Alaska.
The Department of Interior estimates billions of barrels of oil are at stake, related to these seven islands. Didn’t Obummer promise America energy independence? Didn’t he promise to help the economy bounce back by lessening our dependence on foreign oil? And despite our ongoing economic depression, Obummer killed the Keystone Pipeline a few months ago. Perhaps, very soon, America will not need the Keystone Pipeline because Alaska will not be remaining as a viable member of the U.S.
To those who think that the shadow government would never sacrifice Alaska to Russia, then please tell me, why would they just give away seven islands, one as big as Delaware, with great natural resources, to the Russians? This is a case of bold-faced treason plain and simple.
Here’s the picture - Alaska contains a wealth of oil but our government is staunchly opposed to allowing us to avail ourselves of it. And via the Keystone Pipeline, these 7 islands could supply nearly 1,000,000 barrels of oil a day. So because of our continued dependence on foreign oil, the price we’re paying per-gallon for gasoline is steadily climbing, and because of this huge giveaway, oil up near the Arctic will be going to Russia.
And the company Russia has hired to do the extraction is none other than Exxon Mobil. Think about how backward things have gotten. The largest oil company in America is going to be drilling in waters around the Arctic where they expect to find 85 billion barrels in recoverable oil. And instead of sending it to Texas refineries, and thereafter to gas stations across America, the oil will be sent to Russia and refined for their use. By the way, if extracted at the rate of 1 million barrels a day, 85 billion barrels of oil would last for 85,000 days. 85,000 days equals well over 200 years.
In March of 2012, with a microphone accidently left on, Obummer made an unguarded comment to Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev.
President Obummer: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved but it is important for him to give me space.”
President Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…”
President Obummer: “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”
President Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
So Obummer is going to be more lenient on nuclear issues because he will be able to be more flexible after the November election. Does “more flexibility” mean killing the Keystone Pipeline prior to giving away seven rich Alaskan Islands to the Russians?
Does more flexibility mean letting the Russians train in Colorado Springs and in Alaska? Does being more flexible mean compromising our defense of Alaska and the southern border? Apparently so.
Also, as already mentioned, local residents along the Alaskan coast have reported that the on-going over flights along the coast have all but ceased. The F-22′s have disappeared. What about national security? These over flights have been a staple of Alaskan defense since the Cold War. If we are close to war with Iran and its ally, Russia, then shouldn’t we beefing up our patrols in Alaska?
After Obummer’s open mic gaff, he announced that he wants to reduce the U.S.’s nuclear weapons arsenal from 5,000 warheads to just 300. The stunning news of his naive, dangerous, and downright un-American plan percolated into the media during the visit of China’s Vice President Xi Jinping. Coincidence?
I can hear you two saying “No way will the Chinese or Russians attack America. After all, we are the world’s greatest super power.” If so, think again.
First of all, Russia has the largest nuclear weapons arsenal in the world, by far. Some sources say that Russia has 3 times as many nukes as the U.S., who has 5,113 nuclear weapons. And the U.S. still officially claims that China only has about 240 nuclear warheads, but recent reports in the Chinese media put the figure as high as 3,500, along with a stockpile of 50 tons of highly-enriched uranium and plutonium.
Second, in November 1997, President Clinton signed Presidential Decision Directive 60, which directs U.S. military commanders to abandon the time-honored nuclear deterrence of "launch on warning."
Clinton’s National Security Aide Robert Bell proudly proclaimed to a group of disarmament advocates, "In this PDD, we direct our military forces to continue to posture themselves in such a way as to not rely on launch on warning - to be able to absorb a nuclear strike and still have enough force surviving to constitute credible deterrence." So the current U.S.’s official national defense policy is that we will “absorb a nuclear strike” before responding. This is patently preposterous. Respond with what, I ask?
PDD-60 removed the nuclear launch codes from our nuclear submarine commanders, so they cannot fire their missiles without direct communication with the president. Those vital communications links will assuredly not survive an EMP attack or a massive first strike. On top of that we have unilaterally agreed to keep over half of our ballistic missile submarines in port at any one time, where they can easily be targeted. The remaining Trident subs on patrol would be unable to respond when communication links and satellites are downed in a first strike.
When you tell the Chinese and Russians that we are going to absorb a first strike, you induce them to make sure they hit us hard with everything necessary to make sure we cannot respond. This is not “credible deterrence.” It is national suicide. President Clinton's orders to the military to absorb a first strike and not launch on warning still stands today. No subsequent president has repealed that Presidential Decision Directive.
GET READY FOLKS, AN EMP ATTACK IS NOT A MATTER OF IF BUT OF WHEN.