SouthernBoy
Regular Member
A distinction without a difference.
Oh, it is a difference when it comes to paying real estate taxes.
A distinction without a difference.
Its on the Inova Fairfax campus, but a separate building from the hospital itself. It's where the doctors have their offices. I do seem to remember, however, that Inova Alexandria has the same Texas statute on its doors. I'll check it out later and respond.
View attachment 11698
(Click on the thumbnail to enlarge.)
As long as you're not licensed under 4413 (29ee), it doesn't seem to apply.A person licensed under 4413 (29ee)...
May not enter this property with a concealed handgun.
definately looks like a quote from the Texas statues although the wording of the 30.06 signage is different than what I see in the code. Not sure what the as ammended means..... maybe, as ammended to my use in a totally different state and referencing a section that I wrote that says "You can't do that"
As long as you're not licensed under 4413 (29ee), it doesn't seem to apply.
Perhaps HQ just shipped the wrong sign, but it seems to only affect visiting Texans who have the TX license.
Because even if one were to liberally allow the consideration that somewhere in there was an expression that no entry was allowed with concealed firearms (potentially thereafter triggering an immediate trespassing violation), it specifically limits it as being directed only to those licensed under 4413 (29ee).^^^^ Not sure how that would only effect people from Texas carrying with a Texas license. Texas statutes don't apply in VA so the sign would simply either be valid and apply to all concealed carrying or not valid and not apply to anyone, from Texas or otherwise.As long as you're not licensed under 4413 (29ee), it doesn't seem to apply.
Perhaps HQ just shipped the wrong sign, but it seems to only affect visiting Texans who have the TX license.
Because even if one were to liberally allow the consideration that somewhere in there was an expression that no entry was allowed with concealed firearms (potentially thereafter triggering an immediate trespassing violation), it specifically limits it as being directed only to those licensed under 4413 (29ee).
You can be "pursuant to" and refer to the phrasing, message, or philosophy without relying on the authority.
There may not be a legal authority in effect by the legislation cited, but there is still conceivably a message of no entry with a concealed handgun pursuant to, or similar to what was cited. But again, all that falls short when it limits its directive to only those licensed under 4413(29ee).
If they had only "mumbo jumbo pursuant to blah blah cite", followed up with "a person may not enter this property with a concealed handgun", I think that it might have started to offer a trespassing legal deterrent to carrying concealed there, despite the non-authoritative, irrelevant preface.