Do yourself a favor and add Solus to your ignore list, it will save you a lot of headaches. The only time I see his posts are when people quote them. I really wish the mods would do something about him because I suspect that he is one of the reasons this place has been so dead lately and people are reluctant to post, because he jumps on them with incorrect facts and drives them away.
And yet again he fails to read things thoroughly because otherwise he'd realize the initiative also gives ex-roommates from the past calendar year, who may disagree with you politically, privilege to have your guns seized as well.
http://sos.wa.gov/_assets/elections/initiatives/FinalText_1016.pdf
Also throws ex-girlfriends and divorced/divorcing spouses into the mix which makes this ripe for a 50 billion dollar industry in America known as...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfRDZ4iOnSo
so as you disparage my comments towards OC Freeman's shock and awe misinformation post based on a cited article, please provide evidence where...
first, please point out i misspoke or provided inaccurate information based on OC Freeman's post against the cited article alpine, from the title to the specifics in his first and subsequent post?
second, the rhetoric both of you are jumping up and down about is currently not on the ballot, is it?
third, didn't see the information you referenced in your post about family etc., in the originally cited article...was that info in there?
fourth, are you not climbing on your own soapbox, again, over something you brought up previously on 29 of feb where 39 lively posts ensued...
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...rotection-orders&highlight=extreme+risk+order
so alpine i await your response to my query, if i misspoke, as i have in the past, will recant and either delete or correct my posting, but ensure you do not read into OC Freeman's post against the article...and my comments therein.
ipse
added
posted by whitney 24 Feb 16: post#14
quote:
There are actually two proposals for "protection orders" filed with the Secretary of State.
Both proposals are sponsored by the same person. With the exception of the term "Extreme Risk" in one, and "Emergency" in the other, side by side comparisons reveal they use the same verbiage.
1. Extreme Risk Protection Orders; filed 2/18/2016 not yet assigned a number.
2. Emergency Protection Order;also filed 2/18/2016 not yet assigned a number.
unquote
apline & OC Freeman...whitney's post is an exemplary example on how to provide unemotional information for everyone's digestion.