Superlite27
Regular Member
imported post
O.K. Excuse me for being obtuse, but I just read the text of Senate Bill 217 which says something illegible to me in court jargon about open carry. There was a notation that SB 217 has been combined with SB 457, which says something in court jargon about courts being able to appoint marshals. So I read SB 457 and couldn't find any confusing courtspeak concerning open carry.
Can someone versed in courtspeak please put things in plain English for my simple mind?
What does SB 217 do?
Is it still SB 217, or is it now SB 457?
Have these (or it) passed?
What does its passage (or failure to pass) mean?
Thank you in advance for your superior translation service!
O.K. Excuse me for being obtuse, but I just read the text of Senate Bill 217 which says something illegible to me in court jargon about open carry. There was a notation that SB 217 has been combined with SB 457, which says something in court jargon about courts being able to appoint marshals. So I read SB 457 and couldn't find any confusing courtspeak concerning open carry.
Can someone versed in courtspeak please put things in plain English for my simple mind?
What does SB 217 do?
Is it still SB 217, or is it now SB 457?
Have these (or it) passed?
What does its passage (or failure to pass) mean?
Thank you in advance for your superior translation service!