wrightme
Regular Member
So no, they did NOT make such concession.They conceeded to licensing (a.k.a. permits) in oral arguments. It can also be placed as a requirement prior to sale (that you be permited or licensed to purchase). Which was held in the opinion.
That is quite different than claiming that "McDonald found registration to be constitutional," which is what you seem to believe.Funtimes said:I read and interpret that as such: Registrations are not unconstitutional, however, there may be certain provisions of a registration that unduly burden the right -- and those provisions may be unconstitutional.
I have no need to counter that statement.Funtimes said:So if the registration doesnt serverly burden, good luck getting rid of it(based on my reading, but if you counter please do so with legal opinions).