I think that if Clarence Thomas writes the opinion or a concurring opinion he will address Heller and McDonald.
Perhaps, yet Scalia's powerful words in Heller did not change state level, nor federal level, prior restraint statutory infringements.
Terry is a clear violation of the 2A and 4A and the court has had an untold number of opportunities to correct a prior wrong...nadda...excuse? "Each case must be ruled on based on the unique set of circumstances"...BS!! Too many are far too similar in all but names and places.
Heine...what is there to say?
Kelo?
QI? Please don't get me started.
Relying on judges to "police" judges is a fools errand...cops will not police themselves and prosecutors are leery of the next election cycle.
Cops have proven time and again to fear their union bosses and not the US Constitution...thanks to judges, and to a lesser extent legislatures.
Clarence Thomas has not been listened to yet...what makes you think a very narrow decision in a anti-gun city/state is going to change anything outside of NYC, let alone NY...remember, the case for the suit being moot is not unfounded and will not be ignored...NYC/NY "fixed" it...see...
ETA: comma